Skip Nav

Can you explain the difference between scientific and non-scientific research?

General Question

❶A formal research is a written report, whileinformal research does not require any written intent and can bedone impromptu.

You must create an account to continue watching

Just another WordPress.com site
Nonscientific and Scientific Research
Choose a video to embed

Disciplines include geology, geography, icecore studies, atmospherics, volcanic activity, Southern Oceanprotein productivity, biology, zoology, extreme cold weatheranalysts, and more. Human behaviour is also studied there. What do scientific research satellites do? Scientific research satellites gather meteorological data for scientific analysis.

This includes observations of the atmosphere of our planet, the stars, the sun and other parts of space. What do scientific research centers do in Antarctica? Antarctic research stations are supported by governments thatsigned or ratified the Antarctic Treaty, which dedicates thecontinent to science. Temporary workers live and work there. The stations provide sleeping areas, eating and work areas, andequipment storage stations where scientists and people who work insupport of science conduct their research into the health of planetearth.

Why do people do scientific research in antarctica? Antarctica is a continent dedicated to science. What are Difference between scientific research and nonscientific research? What are the steps in scientific research? Don't forget the materials list.

Explain the hallmarks of scientific research? The hallmarks or main distinguishing characteristics of scientific research may be listed follows: What are the aims of scientific research? The aims of scientific research is to support or not-support a hypothesis.

You must understand that results of scientific research can not be proven just supported and the with non-support. Why scientist work for scientific researches? Why you are interested in scientific research?

Then we get new plants and iPods. It works out well and then there is Global Warming!! What is the difference between scientific method and research? Scientific research vs everyday research?

What is the scientific research in Antarctica? Scientific research is a complex process. In Antarctica, scientists perform raw data collection to answerquestions they ask about the health of planet earth. The remainder of the process takes place in their home locationsusing the raw data collected on the continent. What do scientific researchers do when they visit Antarctica?

Visiting scientists to Antarctica collect data to answer thequestion they've asked about the health of planet Earth. Why scientific researches are wastage of time? What are goals of scientific research? The goals of scientific research is to find out the cause of evolution of the earth and its relationship with the elements of the nature and how to use the same for the benefit of mankind.

What are the nine steps of scientific research? Why are graphs important to scientific research? Graphs show a visual quntification of scientific data.

They allow one to see changes and relative elements of the data being plotted. Why is scientific research expensive? Scientific research is expensive because it typically involves a team of scientists, each of which typically receive a salary for working on the research project. Other expenses include materials, facilities, and utlities used by the research team. These costs can be high depending on the project and make research projects are funded by government grants. What are the pros and cons of scientific research?

The pros are good outcomes of something. The cons are the bad outcomes of something. Scientific research has first and foremost, helped in the medical field. People live longer nowadays 2. It is helpful in the cosmetic field. Not only does it make people feel more beautiful and hence get more self-confidence but also, it can help to improve people's lives. After an accident where the victim has been defaced or from birth itself, someone got 'facial malformations' eg.

Scientific research helps to correct the imperfections, the errors of nature. Quite recently, we have started exploring space. Here also, the researches may prove to be very useful. Already, we have discovered atoms of water on Mars. We may find new sources of energy. Our exhaustible and highly polluting sources of energy will soon be used up.

Space exploration may be the solution to a better life for future generations to come. Scientific research is very costly. We are spending a lot of money on a 'project' which results are uncertain while mankind in the third world are suffering from poverty. Animal lovers always argue the fact that animals suffer during scientific experiences animal testing.

Indeed, during animal testing, many of them lose their lives vainly. During the researches, several animals may perish without getting any satisfying results. Scientific research is a way to contradict nature's cycle but generally, 'nature knows best'. By alterating the natural cylce, we are fetching for problems.

Already, we have started seeing the negative effects of our deeds There are lots more What is the differences between scientific research and common sense? Scientific research is based on the idea of developing a reliable way to learn about how the world works.

Sometimes things people consider to be "common sense" truth prove to be false when studied scientifically. Sometimes scientists study their topic in such deep detail that their research seems silly by commonsense standards. Why is scientific research permitted in Antarctica?

However, the oceans adjoining Antarctica teem up with life,it has been a cold and a forbiding land that has had no parmanent human population and settlement, has had unusual political history and is almost devoid of animal or plant life. What are the advantages and disadvantages of scientific research? Allows the study of the world around us, and to be able to understand everything and how things are connected.

Helps us to discover new things. Sometimes it takes alot of time for a breakthrough, and this is also a big cost factor. Sometimes scientists 'fake evidence' to get government funding. Why is research important in a scientific investigation? If one doesn't research before doing an experiment, one won't have any background knowledge on what they are doing. This way, when one gets results, they will have this information to back the results up.

Of course, this is assuming that the scientific investigation isn't totally new to humankind so that there wouldn't be any information on the subject one is investigating. How do ethics affect scientific research? Before a scientist performs an experiment, he should ask himself ifit will harm anyone or anything. This is the ethical part. Thereare many areas of debate, so each scientist must answer thequestion for himself. What are the building blocks of scientific research?

The essential tenets of scientific research are: One of the primary methods of scientific investigation is the hypothetico-deductive method. The method of starting with a theoretical framework, formulating hypotheses and logically deducing from the results of the study is known as hypothetico-deductive method.

The deduction and induction are two important aspects of the scientific research through which the answers to a research question can be arrived at.

Further details on deduction and induction are dealt below; Deduction Deduction is a process by which the researchers arrive at a reasoned conclusion by logical generalization of a known fact. Deduction leads to conclusions, which should be necessarily based on reasons. The reasons are said to imply the conclusions and represent a proof. The bond between the reasons and conclusions is much stronger than in the case of induction. To be correct, a deduction should be both valid and true. Plus, get practice tests, quizzes, and personalized coaching to help you succeed.

Login here for access. Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course. Login or Sign up. Devin has taught psychology and has a master's degree in clinical forensic psychology. He is working on his PhD.

Those of you who are familiar with research might be scratching your heads right now, because the words 'nonscientific research' seem oxymoronic. But historically, this oxymoron has actually been used more than the scientific research model. Scientific research is a logically stepped process used for investigating and acquiring or expanding our understanding. The findings of scientific research can be reproduced and demonstrated to be consistent.

Nonscientific research is acquiring knowledge and truths about the world using techniques that do not follow the scientific method.

For instance, Plato was a large proponent of some of these, and Freud's theories use several of them as well. Let's look at several of the more oft-used nonscientific methods to see what pitfalls are out there.

Tradition is knowledge and understanding that is believed to be true because it has been traditionally accepted. No one has stopped to say, 'Hey, wait a minute. Personal experience is information or understanding derived from experiencing something firsthand. There doesn't seem to be a problem with this at first, but it is actually incredibly flawed because experience is subjective and not reproducible.

For instance, dreams seem to predict the future. Most likely, you had a dream that was similar to the event and your mind just filled in the blanks to make it seem like it all happened before. Intuitive knowledge comes from understanding and believing in an idea based on a gut instinct or through personal insight. This is the 'I know it because I know it' category of knowledge, where someone cannot offer a good reason for something, but they just know it to be true.

For instance, eyewitnesses to a crime appear more accurate when they are more confident. This is false and has been found time and again by researchers.

Confidence has nothing to do with a person's accuracy when recalling something in the past. But, many people rely on what they feel is the right answer, and someone who is confident must be right! Logic is the application of thought and reasoning to come to a conclusion.

But, much like personal experience, the process is flawed by a person's limited viewpoint. You cannot think about something you don't already know. Get access risk-free for 30 days, just create an account. This is a favorite study of mine. Logic cannot predict things that do not make logical sense.

In addition, logic does not contribute additional information. It merely reworks what is already known. Authority is accepting information from a figure in power. Sometimes this is a legitimate way to obtain knowledge and information. For instance, your psychology professor may be an expert on memory or how to design an experiment.

If they are an authority on the information, then it is a good place to get the information from. The problem is when people receive information from people in an authoritative position, rather than a person who is an authority on the subject. A police officer is a person in an authoritative position; a neuropsychologist is a person who is an authority on neuropsychology.

Another example is, 'I have heard that turkey has tryptophan, and that is what makes you sleepy during Thanksgiving. The Internet has become an authority, and many people fail to vet where they gather their information from.

For example, it is true that turkey does have the neurotransmitter tryptophan, which can make a person sleepy. But, a turkey has an insufficient amount of neurotransmitter to affect a full-grown human. The sleepiness after a Thanksgiving meal is more likely caused by a glut of good food. The scientific method is a logically stepped process used for investigating and acquiring or expanding our understanding.

Nonscientific methods rely on tradition, personal experience, intuition, logic and authority to arrive at conclusions. Most of these are no longer accepted in the scientific community, but they were once extremely popular and used by many famous historical figures.

To unlock this lesson you must be a Study. Did you know… We have over college courses that prepare you to earn credit by exam that is accepted by over 1, colleges and universities. You can test out of the first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. Anyone can earn credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level.

To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page. Not sure what college you want to attend yet? The videos on Study. Students in online learning conditions performed better than those receiving face-to-face instruction. By creating an account, you agree to Study. Explore over 4, video courses.

Find a degree that fits your goals. Nonscientific and Scientific Research: Definitions and Differences Explore the way people 'know' information without using a scientific methodology. Posted on October 21, , in Uncategorized. I think that psychology should aim to use scientific methods. Mainly because they are often reliable due to often being easy to replicate.

Also, scientific experiments are usually high in internal validity due to the high levels of control, which ensures that the researcher is testing what they aim to. Also, by using scientific methods it reduces the chance of bias because science is objective and uses empirical evidence rather than acting subjective and relying on personal experience.

However, like you mentioned some branches of psychology, like the psychodynamic theory do not use scientific methods. Freuds theories cannot be falsified and often cannot be tested which causes them to lack reliability.

But, despite Freud using non-scientific methods his theories were still highly influential and have highlighted many important issues, such as the influence childhood can have on later-life or the influence of the unconscious mind.

So, although his theories are often scientifically impossible to test they have been beneficial to psychology. Also, I think non-scientific methods are acceptable to be used if they provoke further scientific research into the field. For instance, non-scientific methods often provide more indepth and detailed results than scientific methods and therefore can be useful in formulating new hypotheses to conduct objective research. So, I think that psychology should aim to use scientific methods, however it is appropriate to intially use non-scientific methods if they then use subsequent scientific methods to support them.

I agree with the comment above. The idea of using non scientific methods to initiate research areas is useful. Often case studies are used in this manor, a case occurs and this often promotes research into areas that have not previously beein thought about. For example Genie and the Czech Twins helped start research into privation, attachment and language development.

I think non-scientific methods are important for research as they provide us with rich and in-depth data about a subject, whereas more scientific methods do not provide such data. However scientific methods are needed to provide data that is reliable and can be used to establish truths. Academic Press New York. The further development of twins after severe and prolonged deprivation: Yes, we should aim to use scientific methods, or at least where the publishing of results is considered — After all, we need to be at least slightly scientific to be taken seriously in todays society.

Live Preview

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Nonscientific research is acquiring knowledge and truths about the world using techniques that do not follow the scientific method. For instance, Plato was a large proponent of some of these, and.

Privacy FAQs

Central to the idea of scientific research is the ability to replicate or falsify. Anything that does not allow you to do these things would be considered unscientific. An example of falsification would be if you ran a survey and found out that

About Our Ads

Scientific research refers to a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge or correcting and integrating previous knowledge consist of collection of data through observation and experimentation and formulation and testing of hypothesis. A scientific research is always able to back its findings, while a non-scientific research is whatever someone found on the internet to back his own claims, without any proof whatsoever.

Cookie Info

For the record, I understand the difference between scientific and non-scientific research. What I’m looking for is how to describe that “visions of God that appeared in my head and which are confirmed with Bible reading” are not the same kind of research as a double-blind, peer reviewed study to someone who thinks that both are equally. Definition of non-scientific - not involving or relating to science or scientific methods.