Both the Bush and Obama administrations have vowed to do whatever is necessary to protect Americans and their values from terrorist threats. However, the measures employed to combat terrorists do not meet the moral and ethical standards that the US government claims to be fighting to defend.
The practices of torture, drone strikes, and government surveillance that the US has conducted represent serious violations of the Geneva Conventions and universal human rights. Moreover, the effectiveness of these practices has been questioned by the international community, and also by subsets of the American government itself.
Similarly, the effectiveness of drone strikes is largely contested, and the consequences of their use on modern warfare can prove counterproductive. For instance, reports suggest that the use of drones serves to foster resentment and perpetuate the emergence of terrorists in the areas in which they are used. The use of drone strikes in conflicting areas could thus reinforce the violence in the region. Finally, the mass collection of data by the National Security Agency is unnecessary.
Gathering intelligence could instead be accomplished through targeted surveillance measures. Despite serious doubts about the value of these programs, the CIA and the American government continue to claim that their methods have been effective and a necessary evil for the greater good. However, the CIA has refused to release any information that supports these assertions.
If the methods have indeed been effective, both the CIA and the US government have the responsibility to the American public to substantiate their claims. With the recent rise of the Islamic State, the Obama administration has reaffirmed its commitment to eradicate all terrorist organizations around the globe. Now more than ever, it is crucial that the United States reevaluates the policies it employs in the war against terrorism.
Only then will the war against terror truly win a decisive victory in its battles against the evils in the world. Skip to content Home U. Foreign Policy The War on Terror: Does the End Justify the Means? Drone Strikes The US drone strike program was first introduced in , and it has continued to remain an integral facet of counterterrorism measures in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. Previous story Profiting From Terrorism: He becomes primarily concerned about his own life and to return to his family alive, the mandate becomes secondary.
Very few want to be a hero and much lesser to be friendly with the enemies. He has to execute a rapid action if his life is endangered. But if a soldier is engaged in killing innocent people just because he could not identify the enemy exactly, then, his action does not justify his motive. If he tortures an enemy or a group of people in search for truth, it can be held unjust. If he is trigger-happy and involved in mass execution because he fails to identify the enemies exactly, he must be condemned and be subject to a court-martial.
There can never be an excuse for killing people at an instant without concrete evidence backed up by reliable logistics, and in so doing, his conscience must be directly involved. But how do we gauge and monitor his professionalism in the battlefield? A soldier is dispatched with a troop and a leader who keeps track of all his moves. She said that the best example of a credible perfectionist is one who does not use military force and violence in any given circumstances, even in self-defense, and he must be an advocate of human rights.
This might be an ideal scenario. War or no war, when life is at stake magnanimity will be a subject for legal arguments especially when self-defense is in question. No person will allow others to take his life without doing anything except for born-heroes. Therefore, justifying the end by the course of action taken depends on how people look at it and it varies on the standpoint of different sectors of the society.
In essence, the end does not always justify the means. The End does not Jusifies the Means. Retrieved on January 26, , from http: The End does not Justify the Means. Retrieved on January 25, , from http: New Haven and London. Does the End Justify the Means?. Does the End Justify the Means? Accessed September 15, Leave your email and we will send you an example after 24 hours If you contact us after hours, we'll get back to you in 24 hours or less.
How to cite this page Choose cite format: How about make it original? Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails. Sorry, but downloading is forbidden on this website.
However, one thing is sure: if an end or goal is worthy, any mean to achieve that end is justifiable provided that both ends and means are noble and good. The question whether the end justifies the means depends on the type of goal or end a person wants to achieve and the means they use.
Mar 02, · The end does not justify the means. We are only justified when the means that we use to reach our goals are just as good as the end result. Some examples of this are murdering your father in order to acclaim the throne, the faults behind the 9/11 attack, and cheating on a .
This essay will discuss the human benefits received and the negative impacts on both humans and animals. By analysing these three aspects, the evidence provided will evaluate whether the end does justify the means of this method. The development of various drugs have been assisted by animal testing which has saved numerous lives and become medical discoveries. The end justifies the means is an expression that is often used in society to validate or excuse distasteful and objectionable actions undertaken by its people. In effect, the phrase is a justification for dispensing with all morality and principle in the passage towards a successful conclusion.
Unlike most editing & proofreading services, we edit for everything: grammar, spelling, punctuation, idea flow, sentence structure, & more. Get started now! The End Justifies The Means. The End Justifies The Means.: An enterprise can succeed only if it has a goal. To achieve that goal an effective method should be adopted. The method can be harmless with no violence in it. Or it can be hard and cruel which calls for a lot of .