His now twisted rationality leads him to believe that chance is the only thing that determines what is truly right, and with a flip of a coin, any action can be justified. Of course, this being me — and I am admittedly a fairly wordy writer, so I apologize if you are dozing off by this point, but please allow me to further elaborate — I do want to expand on this just a bit more before bringing this review to a close, and I do appreciate your patience, as I cannot help myself!
I obviously love this film a lot, so you can probably guess the score, go check to confirm, and come back to this point if you wish to continue. In the end, Batman finds his own redemption comes at the cost of his reputation. In the end, he may look like the villain, but in truth, he believes that he will be the hero that Gotham needs him to be, working in shadow as their Dark Knight.
The film pulls no punches in remaining ambiguous in its own moral philosophies, if there are any to be truly had. It reveals not only the intricacies of these characters interactions with each other, but what they mean to us. That, to me, basically seems to be the ultimate goal for most great works of art. Audience reaction resulted in the Academy expanding the film nominations to ten the following year, resulting in nominations for two sci-fi films, one animated film, a comedy, and a film based in alternate history.
Bring on the inevitably pale-by-comparison but undoubtedly excellent third film! You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. His desire for revenge for a non-real action is his madness.
There are four similarities between him and Islamic terrorists:. As concerns the latter, the two specific instances in which the Joker begs both Batman and Dent to kill him represent crucibles of character where law and vigilantism diverge.
The Joker is the personification of terror as a senseless, motiveless, and insatiable force. Terror exists to terrorize. Thought The third most important category according to Aristotle is thought. The question in The Dark Knight is simple: This is one of the critical jurisdictional and foreign policy arguments of our time. The rhetorical distinction between crime and terrorism is one of the issues which separate conservatives from liberals. The determinate space in The Dark Knight is urban, but it is not a gangster film.
The style and the ethics of the movie is characteristic of film noir in which there is no true hero e. Bogart in The Maltese Falcon. In the comic book by Frank Miller, Gotham is a morally corrupt and decaying city. This is a conservative idea because liberals believe that crime and criminals are not immoral but are caused by economic circumstances. In classic terms, conservativs believe that human nature is flawed; liberals believe that human nature is good but that society is flawed.
The conservative view is psychologically or spiritually determined; the liberal is socially determined. Even more extreme is the viewpoint of the hard Left which ascribes an inherent immorality to conservatives because of their ideology , but never to criminals, to terrorists, or to Communists.
Kucinich call for President George Bush et. Oliver Stone makes movies about the evil military or about evil Republicans but never about Communism, which in a few decades exterminated 50 million people throughout the world. Liberals see conservatives as the enemy; conservatives see foreign terrorists as the enemy.
All action movies hinge on this critical question: Institutions are integral parts of setting. In The Dark Knight , the institutions represented are:. Remarkably, all the prominent people associated with these institutions are represented as brave people with integrity.
Liberal movies always locate the threats to society internally, in our own government. Conservative movies locate threats to society externally, outside our government. In The Dark Knight , the forces of corruption are external, symbolized by ethnic identifiers: There was a situation when Batman hit him hard enough, but the latter does not even lose consciousness and does not feel pain because he is frostbitten. We can assume this character is not in a mask, but a character with no mask.
Analyzing the activities of this person is extremely important not to become crazy, yet two English men wrote a script for this film. To explain more clearly, the activity of the Joker was expressed in making corrections in the very particular situation.
As the antagonist himself said, he had no definite goals. The criminal seemed to be endowed with providential qualities, and with these qualities, he entered the game. When the Joker killed the staff of the City Hall and the police, who by their ambivalence rejected some people, they became a mafia. Next, the judge who represents the blind Themis. Then he punished the mafia, suffering from the absence of fundamental ideas. It is possible to say that the Joker struck at the foundations of society, which led this society to a dead end.
It is a symbol of the fact that Harvey Dent was to be engaged in the improvement of society. The Joker and his crew could kill in turn and Harvey Dent, but the director singled Harvey Dent to the fore. Harvey Dent in this story causes some sympathy. In my opinion, he sincerely wanted to be positive, he believed in Roman law and the letter of the law. A nickname Two-faced Harvey, is given because he had particular type of face.
There are only two profiles, each of which seemed to be a separate person. And what did Harvey Dent see? From the part, Harvey Dent himself is guilty of what happened to him.
He lit a Batman floodlight instead of fighting crime in the framework of the Law. It was a kind of sporting interest, as the Joker said, he was not interested in his death and Batman complements him.
And how, the synthetic embodiment of evil could complement the Joker, which in turn is a certain principle in physics that attracts charged particles? After all, the result of this contact was the complete mutual exclusion of all particles.
There is no direct connection between Bruce Wayne and the Joker, as the Joker became the product of the system that Bruce Wayne created. This phrase needs to be understood as not only the Joker is evil, but also that the Joker was born of evil. In this regard, we can add that in the future there may be more than one. The film the Dark Knight can be compared with the fragments of mirrors, which are the photons.
In these mirrors are visible reflections of certain characters. They say and do something, but we can not understand the general sense, because this is only part of the picture, and the characters sometimes do not know what they say and do. We need to touch these mirrors and move them so that people see the reflections of other mirrors.
Only after that, we can compare the facts and find out the truth. We see a fragment in which Harvey Dent says that the Joker was released from the leash.
Jul 20, · Home > Favorite Movies, Reviews > Special Review: “The Dark Knight” – An Essay on Ethics and Excellence Special Review: “The Dark Knight” – An Essay on Ethics and Excellence July 20, CJ Stewart Leave a comment Go to comments.
In the movie, "The Dark Knight," the main villain is a sadistic criminal, who refers to himself as the "Joker." This evil, twisted and brilliant character is the arch-nemesis of Batman, the "Caped Crusader" who watches over and protects the much beleaguered and crime-ridden Gotham City. The Joker 3/5(3).
The Dark Knight The Dark Knight is an action hero film from directed and co-written by Christopher Nolan. It is Christopher Nolan’s second film based on the comic hero Batman, and it’s the second movie to the Batman Begins. The Dark Knight was possibly the mainstream blockbuster to have been released in , therefore it was relevant to be used in this essay. The internet movie database. The Dark Knight.
The Dark Knight is a legendary film. Plot of the film and scenery are based on comics and this genre is called comic book movie. This article is not a film review in the conventional sense but is rather an essay meant to illustrate my method of analysis.