It is certainly the 10th juror who most vehemently represents the potential frightening power of racism and xenophobia. Due to the defendants background he is often treated unfairly by the 10th juror but by the end of the play he is left with no option but to withdraw his argument. Accessed September 14, We will write a custom essay sample on Twelve Angry Men specifically for you.
Leave your email and we will send you an example after 24 hours If you contact us after hours, we'll get back to you in 24 hours or less. Twelve Angry Men Essay. How to cite this page Choose cite format: Twelve angry men presents the pessimistic view that all humans are flawed do you agree? How about make it original? Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. The knife that was the murder weapon was unique and the boy was seen with it, although he said he had lost it.
That the old lady saw the boy kill his father through her window, whilst a train was passing. Juror 8 analyses each of these points and makes credible arguments that the conclusion is flawed based on incorrect reasoning, by pointing out inconsistencies in the conclusions reached. The other jurors are content to believe that their reasoning is solid, as they have used examples of deductive reasoning to reach their conclusion.
Chaffee tells about deductive reasoning. The deductive argument is the one most commonly associated with the study of logic. Though it has a variety of valid forms, they all share one characteristic: If you accept the supporting reasons also called premises as true, then you must necessarily accept the conclusion as true. Or what does this show? He analyses the content, by breaking down the component parts and analysing each point through examination of what has been presented.
He then synthesises the content by pulling together what he had summarized, and analysed and discusses it with the input of the other jurors. Finally he reaches an evaluation, and presents this to his peers on the jury as a reasonable version of events.
This process as described in Troyka, Hesse of Sumarise, analyse, synthesise and evaluate, marks juror 8 out from the rest of the jury as the most effective critical thinker as he engages in this process throughout the movie. The antithesis to Juror 8 may be Juror 3 as portrayed by Lee J. We get the impression that he has made his mind up and has settled on a verdict of guilty to satisfy some personal feelings.
He is shown to be morally conflicted. The question of morals and ethics also run a current theme through the movie. Within the characters there are overt moral and ethical issues raised. The subject of the movie is essentially a moral or ethical question, it asks us the audience, what would you do?
Asking us to invoke our values and assumptions, and find the truth amongst the evidence presented. The movie gives us various characters of differing levels in society all bound together for one purpose, to find the truth in the evidence given which may result in a death sentence for the accused. The varying personalities and degrees of moral fortitude is evident from their reactions.
Another ethical issue is the use of persuasion by juror 8 who seems intent on turning the jury to find with him, he uses methods that may be ethically unsound to sway other easily pliable members of the jury his way to gain momentum to use against his most fervent foes on the panel.
The burden of proof is the most difficult in law it is beyond a reasonable doubt, and Juror 8 who through reason and logic, who sees through the fallacies and falsehoods created by those in the room, who sows the seeds of doubt through the analysis and synthesis of the evidence provided, leads the group to a single conclusion. We as an audience are also left with the narrative as was unfolded, and it is down to us whether we believe that the truth was uncovered or whether it was just a matter of objective persuasion and therefore whether the ends justify the means.
Free 12 angry men papers, essays, and research papers.
Apr 17, · Free Essays from Bartleby | 12 Angry Men () focuses on a group of unnamed jurymen who must come to a unanimous decision regarding the guilt or innocence.
12 Angry Men study guide contains a biography of Reginald Rose, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis. Analysis of 12 Angry Men Essay - The play 12 Angry Men is one of the greatest plays I’ve seen. I read the novel and saw both movies but my favorite was the Broadway play we saw as a class.
12 Angry Men Essay There are millions of movies produced. Even though we have the modern cinematography and films of different genres that can satisfy every spectator, some old movies remain popular to this day. The movie 12 Angry Men depicts the story about 12 people serving as jury who have completely different attitudes, personalities, emotions and approaches in.